Archive for the ‘Sales Process’ Category

Forecasting Enabling Technology

Monday, April 1st, 2013

Aberdeen Group research published in 2012, Better Sales Forecasting Through Process and Technology, highlights how top performers better deploy process and technology to achieve not only more accurate forecasts, but better business results.

Forty-one percent (41%) of Best-in-Class (top 20%) firms within this research (defined as superior customer retention and sales quota attainment metrics, as well as shortening sales cycles) support “integrating sales content into the CRM to better inform the forecast with sales activities executed during the selling/buying cycle,” while 21% of Industry Average firms (middle 50%) and only 12% of Laggards (bottom 30%) do the same.

Additionally, Aberdeen points out that 90% of Best-in-Class firms use enabling technology for sales forecasting and analytics, vs. 76% of Industry Average firms and 58% of Laggards.

These numbers are somewhat surprising, particularly that so many firms are still “lagging” at some level on this topic. Technology indeed can be overdone in sales organizations; however, it certainly must be used.

Territory Planning – Purpose and Process

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

Surprisingly enough, most companies do not have or require a formal Territory Planning Review. What mostly exists is a regular but informal review of a sales rep’s Pipeline/ Forecast either weekly, monthly or quarterly.

These are very different vehicles for the rep and for sales management. They should stay distinct.

The ideal Territory Plan is less than 12 slides in PowerPoint or tabs in spreadsheet. While data may or may not be extracted from a company’s CRM, the key is that purposeful information is compiled in a regular format on a regular timetable (quarterly is most common). Reviewed with management and other key players (yes, Marketing), this sharing of high level perspective, strategies, issues, competitors and plans brings invaluable corporate insight and visibility across the organization.

While similar topics may be raised in a weekly Opportunity Pipeline/Forecast review, there is goodness that comes out of a disciplined approach to salesperson’s territory review. Keep it simple, clean and regular – reps and managers will grow to appreciate it.

How’s your Territory Planning Process?

Channel Savvy Selling

Monday, June 18th, 2012

Indirect sales channels are used in many industries, particularly in technology hardware, software and SaaS environments. It’s cost effective and allow for more “feet in the street” who already know “where the bodies are.” That is to say, good channel partners are positioned in the marketplace with focused attention on customers and prospects and will drive more business for you if you can drive the right incentives for them. Here are 3 truths about channel selling:

1. Squeaky Partner Gets the Deal
While it may not be fair, it appears true that the vendor and channel partner that have more interaction with each other do more business. Whether a channel manager or a rep selling through channel partners, the more you stay in contact with your partner, the increased likelihood that you will conduct more deals and book more revenue together. Why is that? Simple. Familiarity, in this case, does not grow contempt, but makes the heart grow fonder – and drive more deals. Know and prioritized your best partners. It pays off.

2. Compensation is Everything
It’s not that it’s just about money, it’s about the highest return for the investment in time and attention. Partners do the calculation, directly or indirectly, an assess whether this vendor or that vendor is worth it, regardless of the corporate push. Know how your partner gets paid and appropriately help them be successful.

3. Channel Partners Don’t Suffer Fools
Sales partners are like you – they want to work with competent people who bring them value. You don’t have to know all the answers, but you need to be responsive and know how to get the answers. Invest the time to know and serve your partner channel with insights and worthwhile activity that will bring them revenue. The resulting value will be mutual.

Are you channel savvy?

Rule 15: Measure Activity Metrics

Sunday, January 15th, 2012

When asked how many new prospecting calls the Inside Sales team made each day, the Director of Sales of a client firm proudly stated that every team on her sales team made 40 calls a day. When I asked her how she knew that, she stated confidently that “she hears them” as she sits in the bullpen with them. “They all know that 40 calls is the number of calls they need to make and that’s what they do.” Oh, really?

This is a common reaction to classic selling activities across organizations. Some manager at some point in the past has declared a number of, you name it, phone calls, demos, meetings, proposals, mailings, etc., etc., that the sales team is to make each hour, day, week, month, or quarter. That becomes the magic number or mantra for the sales organization for a range of time until someone comes along and changes it or challenges it. Many firms and reps don’t know just how valuable these metrics actually are, but often they become unrealistic, onerous, or useless hurdles at which the team winks or rolls their eyes.

I learned long ago that every business has key sales activity metrics, which once discovered can drive one to consistent excellence in sales performance or management of a team’s performance. In every sales territory I’ve managed I’ve sought to understand key selling activities, their appropriate dose, and their yield. I recommend setting up a 30-Day Activity Measurement Plan. There are three steps:

Identify 4–6 Top Selling Activities—actions such as prospecting phone calls, customer meetings, conference calls, demonstrations, emails, proposals, etc. Determine no more than six (you don’t want to track too many or you’ll defeat the purpose here); no fewer than four. These are actions that you or management have deemed important in the selling process of your product or service.

Assign a Relevant Point Value to Each Activity—for instance, outbound calls might count one point, a meeting might count four points, an outbound email two points, etc. The key is to have a scoring system that is simple and relevant for each of the 4–6 selling activities identified. Don’t over-engineer this; keep it simple and on the honor system if tracking a team.

Track the Metrics—now track the metrics daily, weekly and quarterly for each of the selling activities. Look for the patterns, trends and ranges in the metrics. See the diagram below for a sample tracking sheet. After just three weeks of tracking you will see clear patterns and norms. Take these to heart as a realistic snapshot of your real activity.

Remember to keep this exercise simple. Don’t over analyze when you’re starting out. Get a foundational benchmark and work from there. There’s value in the truth. When we conducted an Activity Metric study
at that firm doing “40 calls daily” we found that the call volume ranged from 19 to 53 calls per day by the team. The top two reps were making 20 calls daily; the worst performers were making over 40. We captured what the successful reps were doing, replicated it and drove all reps to make at least 25 high quality calls per day.

How’s your activity tracking?

New Year Selling

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

We wrote a couple of months ago about the end of the “Solution Selling” era. This month we’ll address the rebirth of sales enablement across progressive selling organizations. A new day (year) is upon us as enlightened companies, consultants and sales trainers develop and implement sticky, adaptable and scalable selling systems that help organizations run like fine-tuned, ultimate sales-driven machines.

The next wave available to companies is an explosion of sales effectiveness and new efficiencies. Prepare for a 10-year run of sales team upgrades and resets.

This new era of sales enablement is already underway in many companies like Citrix, Fujitsu, Adobe, Boeing and VMware, to name a few, that are investing in re-optimized sales tools and practices for their modern updated sales teams.

There are 4 components* to a revamped sales enablement program:
1. Strategy (where to go)
2. Messaging (what to say)
3. Process (what to do)
4. Leadership (how to coach)

* DSG Consulting, an MXL Partners affiliate partner firm.

The redevelopment and integration of each of these component areas into carefully tailored sales 2.0 manual and automated playbooks is opening up an exciting new frontier in a land filled with opportunity. We’ll break down each component in this SalesNote.

Are you “revamping” enablement of your sales organization?

Tebows and Turkeys

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

It’s November and we’re deep into the fall sales quarter, football games and we’re fast-facing the holiday season. Just this past weekend we witnessed the game of century (LSU vs Alabama), Tim Tebow highs and lows, and depending on your favorite team, a slew of great and weak performances as teams vie for bowl games and playoff berths.

Reminds me of salespeople and sales teams as they wind down these last 2 months of the year. There are those that step up and those that check out; those that live up to the hype and those that disappoint; those that overcome adversity and those that crumble under pressure. We watch it every week on TV. And we watch it every year as it’s crunch-time season in the sales arena.

Tebows and turkeys abound.

Regardless of what you think of Tim Tebow’s NFL prospects as a productive quarterback, he’s a winner. What he did this past weekend in Oakland, CA is a great example of one stepping up, living up to the hype, and overcoming adversity. A VP of Sales would love to have a whole team full of Tim Tebows who can face knockdowns, disparagement, failure and come roaring back with tenacity, hustle, appropriated skill, mental and physical toughness, and a gracious winning attitude. Sorry if you’re a Florida, Tebow or Denver hater – gotta love a gutsy winner with heart.

In our business we can teach sales skills, process and prowess. We can’t teach heart. Heart can be developed over time but must come from within. You know when you see it. It’s a great thing to watch in any field of play.

Rethinking Solution Selling

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

With all due respect to Michael Bosworth, author of Solution Selling, it’s time to rethink “solution selling.” Both the selling world and customer interactions have changed and require adjustments to common selling motions.

Besides, after all the books and training over 15 years, try to find one VP of Sales or Account Executive who can tell you what the 9-Block Vision Processing Model is or even what exactly are “the 9 Boxes.” While brilliant in theory and profound for a past generation, the practical application is often lost in the reality of today’s dynamic sales arena. There’s also a new generation selling in a different era.

While my sales, management and consulting career grew up with Rackham and Bosworth over the past 30 years, today I’m seeing 4 challenges facing salespeople relative to selling methodologies:

1. Shorter Conversations - customer conversations are often brief and on the phone. Reps need to be agile and skilled in the managing of short selling conversations.
2. Blended Conversations – lead generation improvements require clear distinctions between call introduction, qualification and discovery. Reps need clarity of process and conversation flow.
3. Convoluted Questioning – sales call questioning process fundamentals have been lost, forgotten or confused. Reps need talk tracks grounded in simplified questioning fundamentals.
4. Mistargeted Discovery – discovery conversations are often given short-shrift, prolonging or derailing sale cycles. Reps need clear discovery plays or templates that are simple, planned, manageable and trackable.

Do you need a revamping of your “solution selling” methodology?

Sales Training Truth

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

It’s our 10th Anniversary. MXL Partners has been providing sales consulting and sales training for companies for a decade. We’ve worked with sales reps and managers from over 150 companies in almost 200 engagements.

Over past years we’ve seen sales training change in the following ways:

  • It’s not about packaged sales training programs.
  • It’s all about custom-built and focused sales training.
  • Experienced sales reps need and appreciate relevant training.
  • Rookies need, want and seek practical and helpful training.
  • Sales Managers want a return to strong sales fundamentals.
  • Value Propositions are best as custom sales messaging built for specific target buyers.
  • A well-defined, well-taught selling process drives best behaviors.
  • Sales Management training is an effective and repeatable sales leadership/coaching system.

Do you have a clear and modern perspective on today’s approach to sales training?

2011 Sales Performance Study – Forecasting Excellence

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

CSO Insight’s recent Sales Optimization Report reveals that when rating their “Ability to Accurately Forecast Business,” 46% of salespeople rate Needs Improvement. This is down from 60% five years ago, so there is progress in forecasting accuracy. There were 44% that rated Meets Expectations, and only 7% seen as Exceeds Expectations.

At MXL Partners, we’re big believers in a rolling 30-60-90 Forecasting methodology. Many companies acknowledge that they practice this, however we’ve recently seen yet another example this quarter of a sophisticated multi-billion organization with sketchy forecasting practices.

While all the information is in the CRM and reports are plentiful, there are still 3 issues:

    1. Visual Clarity in Reporting – CRM reports are cluttered and inconsistent, allowing missed cues and trends buried in the data.
    2. Consistent Updating and Accuracy of Information – without deliberate discipline and appropriate attention to detail at the rep and management level, this is a key reason for misleading forecasting.
    3. Adherence to Sales Process – paying only lip service to stages, milestones and stepscauses more pain and delusion than it should.

When a rep creates and manages their own visibility reports of all Pipeline, Best Case and Commit Opportunities, updates this weekly with views over at least a rolling 90-day horizon, and then forces adjustments and actions to this Pipeline/Forecast view per a prescribed milestone process, then they will be prepared to report to management, and themselves, with truth and accuracy.

It’s actually simple and powerfully effective. The problem is not in the CRM but at rep and management level.

Reps Know Products, But…

Monday, April 18th, 2011

CSO Insight’s recent Sales Optimization Report reveals that salespeople are knowledgeable about their products. However, there are clear weaknesses when it comes to effectively understanding buyers, cross-sell/up-sell, selling value and forecasting accuracy:

Meet or Exceed Expectations- Effectively present Features and Benefits = 67%
- Differentiate from Competition = 69%
- Align Solutions with Customer Needs = 68%
- Generate Accurate Bid/Proposal = 85%

Needs Improvement- Understanding Customer Buy Process = 40%
- Effectively Cross-sell/Up-sell = 47%
- Sell Value/Avoid Discounting = 42%
- Forecasting Accurately = 54%

This data shows that salespeople, for the most part, know their products, but are lacking in areas not typically emphasized in training across sales teams.